<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Deceit.blog: #historical-method</title>
    <link>https://deceit.blog/tag/historical-method</link>
    <description>Essays on what manipulation costs and why it lands. Tagged &quot;historical-method&quot;.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 02:10:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link href="https://deceit.blog/tag/historical-method/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
      <item>
        <title>The same machine has been forging documents for two thousand years</title>
        <link>https://deceit.blog/essay/two-thousand-years-of-forgery</link>
        <guid>https://deceit.blog/essay/two-thousand-years-of-forgery</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Explain. In 1389 a bishop wrote to the pope about a cloth. Pierre d&apos;Arcis had a burial shroud on display in his diocese at Lirey. Pilgrims were paying to see it. He told Clement VII that the cloth was a painting, that it had been &quot;cunningly painted,&quot; and that the artist who made it had confessed. He named th…</description>
      </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>