Research Layer / Evidence Check

Claim vs. Evidence

27 public statements about Jeffrey Epstein and his associates, checked against released government documents and credible reporting.

Verdicts are conservative: we document contradictions, not intent. A "Lie" verdict means the claim is directly contradicted by primary evidence; it does not prove the speaker's intent. Being named in a contact book or flight log is not proof of criminal knowledge. For the full research compendium, see EPSTEIN-FILES-RESEARCH.md and the raw library at EPSTEIN-LIES-LIBRARY.md.

Verdict key

Lie The claim is a verifiable falsehood directly contradicted by primary evidence. (10)

False claim The claim is presented as fact but has no credible support in the released files. (7)

Misleading The claim is technically tethered to real evidence but frames it in a way that creates a false impression. (3)

Partially accurate The claim contains some true elements but overstates or misrepresents the evidence. (3)

Confirmed The claim is supported by the released documents or authoritative reporting. (1)

Unverified The evidence is incomplete or authentication has not been established. (3)

CHECK_01

Trump

U.S. President (2025–)

Lie Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

Bill Clinton visited Jeffrey Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands “28 times.”

Source: FactCheck.org, citing Trump remarks · 2025-08

Evidence

DOJ Epstein flight logs
Flight logs show Clinton traveled on Epstein’s aircraft, including a 2002 Africa trip, but do not document 28 island visits.
FactCheck.org analysis
No evidence supports the specific “28 times” island claim. Clinton flew on Epstein’s plane multiple times, but destination records do not establish that count.

Notes

The “28 times” figure is a verifiable falsehood. Flight logs prove association but do not document the asserted island visits, and no other source supports the specific count.

#Clinton#flight logs#island#misinformation

People index (1)

Trump — associate, uncharged

CHECK_02

Rep. Melanie Stansbury

U.S. Representative (D-NM)

Misleading The verdict is reasonable but depends on a single authoritative source or interpretation.

Claim

Trump “absolutely knew” that Ghislaine Maxwell was recruiting and grooming young women from Mar-a-Lago and bringing them to Epstein’s house.

Source: CNN appearance, cited by FactCheck.org · 2025-11-17

Evidence

Released House Oversight emails / Epstein estate documents
Emails contain Epstein comments that can be interpreted as involving Trump, but they do not show direct evidence that Trump knew of criminal recruitment or grooming.
FactCheck.org “Sorting out the Facts on Epstein Claims”
Stansbury’s wording “overstate[s] what the documents have revealed so far.” The evidence is suggestive, not conclusive.

Notes

The claim conflates Epstein’s private comments with proof of Trump’s knowledge. The documents may support suspicion, but they do not “absolutely prove” knowledge.

#Stansbury#Maxwell#Mar-a-Lago#oversight

CHECK_03

Ghislaine Maxwell

Epstein associate, convicted co-conspirator

Lie Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

During her 2016 deposition, Maxwell refused to answer questions about sexual contact with Jeffrey Epstein and Johanna Sjoberg, framing such matters as consensual adult activity and private.

Source: Unsealed deposition transcript, Giuffre v. Maxwell · 2016-04-22

Evidence

Unsealed Giuffre v. Maxwell deposition transcript
Maxwell’s counsel instructed her not to answer questions about massages and sexual contact with Epstein and Sjoberg, asserting they were “consensual adult” and irrelevant.
Maxwell trial evidence and conviction
A federal jury convicted Maxwell of conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse minors and recruiting/grooming underage girls.
Johanna Sjoberg testimony
Sjoberg, a victim, testified that Maxwell recruited her to work for Epstein and that the work involved sexualized contact.

Notes

Maxwell’s deposition strategy treated the activity as private and consensual. The later criminal trial and conviction established that the conduct involved minors and coercion, exposing her framing as a lie.

#Maxwell#deposition#trial#conviction#Sjoberg

People index (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell — central, convicted

CHECK_04

Prince Andrew, Duke of York

Member of British royal family

Lie Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

Andrew stated he has “no recollection of ever meeting” Virginia Giuffre and denied her allegations of sexual abuse.

Source: BBC Newsnight interview and subsequent legal filings · 2019-11

Evidence

Photograph of Andrew, Giuffre, and Maxwell
A widely circulated photograph shows Andrew with his arm around Giuffre, with Maxwell in the background, contradicting the claim of no recollection.
Virginia Giuffre deposition and lawsuit
Giuffre testified that she was trafficked to Andrew and that sexual abuse occurred.
Giuffre v. Prince Andrew settlement
Andrew settled Giuffre’s civil lawsuit in 2022 for an undisclosed sum while continuing to deny the allegations.

Notes

The photograph and sworn testimony directly contradict the “no recollection” claim. A photograph of the meeting exists, and a victim testified under oath about the encounter.

#Prince Andrew#Giuffre#photograph#settlement#royal

People index (1)

Prince Andrew, Duke of York — named, settled

CHECK_05

Social media / Aaron Rodgers

Public commentator / athlete

False claim Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

Jimmy Kimmel was named in the unsealed Epstein documents.

Source: FactCheck.org, tracking viral claim · 2024-01

Evidence

FactCheck.org verification
Kimmel does not appear in the unsealed court documents. The claim originated from an unsupported comment by Aaron Rodgers.
Unsealed Giuffre v. Maxwell documents
No mention of Jimmy Kimmel in the released batches.

Notes

A clear example of a fabricated “name drop” that spread because audiences expected celebrity names in the files.

#Kimmel#Rodgers#viral claim#misinformation#names

CHECK_06

Social media users

Unknown / viral spreaders

Lie Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

A photograph shows Vice President Kamala Harris posing with Jeffrey Epstein.

Source: FactCheck.org, viral social media posts · 2023-12

Evidence

FactCheck.org forensic analysis
The image is a digitally manipulated composite. The original photo showed Harris with her husband, Douglas Emhoff.

Notes

A fabricated image is a verifiable lie. The original photo showed Harris with her husband, Douglas Emhoff, not Jeffrey Epstein.

#Harris#AI image#manipulation#misinformation#photo

CHECK_07

Politicians, influencers, and social media

Various

Lie Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

The Epstein files contain a secret “client list” that names all prominent people who participated in criminal activity.

Source: Widespread public discourse · 2024–2025

Evidence

DOJ/FBI memo, July 2025
“This systematic review revealed no incriminating ‘client list.’”
DOJ Epstein Library
The released materials include contact books, flight logs, and correspondence, but no document labeled or functioning as a “client list.”

Notes

The “client list” narrative is a categorical error. Contact books are not client lists, and the FBI/DOJ explicitly found no incriminating client list in its holdings.

#client list#DOJ#FBI#misinformation#narrative

CHECK_08

Conspiracy theorists and media commentators

Various

Lie Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

Epstein operated a blackmail scheme using secret recordings to control powerful people.

Source: Widespread speculation · 2019–2025

Evidence

DOJ/FBI memo, July 2025
“There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions.”
DOJ/FBI memo, July 2025
The FBI did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.

Notes

The FBI/DOJ review explicitly found no credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals. The claim is therefore a verifiable falsehood, not a plausible theory awaiting evidence.

#blackmail#FBI#DOJ#conspiracy#evidence

CHECK_09

Alexander Acosta / Epstein defense team

Former U.S. Attorney / Epstein attorneys

False claim Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

The 2008 non-prosecution agreement was an appropriate state-level resolution of the Florida investigation.

Source: Court filings, press statements, congressional testimony · 2008–2019

Evidence

Miami Herald “Perversion of Justice” investigation
The series exposed that the agreement granted broad federal immunity to Epstein and potential co-conspirators and shut down the FBI investigation at the time.
2019 SDNY indictment of Jeffrey Epstein
Federal prosecutors charged Epstein with sex trafficking of minors years after the non-prosecution agreement, contradicting the claim that the 2008 deal was a complete or adequate resolution.
DOJ Data Set 9 (emails about 2008 NPA)
Released emails include internal DOJ correspondence about the non-prosecution agreement, showing it was controversial and conferred broad immunity.

Notes

The 2008 deal was legally unusual and was later undermined by the federal indictment, civil suits, and public scrutiny. The claim that it was an adequate or complete resolution is a false claim given the later federal prosecution for the same underlying conduct.

#Acosta#non-prosecution agreement#2008#Florida#DOJ

People index (2)

CHECK_10

Conspiracy theorists and social media

Various

Lie Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in custody to prevent him from testifying.

Source: Widespread conspiracy theory · 2019–present

Evidence

DOJ Office of Inspector General report (June 2023)
The OIG concluded Epstein died by suicide and identified negligence and misconduct by correctional officers, but no homicide.
DOJ/FBI memo, July 2025
The FBI reviewed enhanced SHU video and concluded that from ~10:40 pm on Aug 9, 2019, until ~6:30 am the next morning, nobody entered the tiers where Epstein was housed.
New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner
Autopsy findings supported suicide by hanging.

Notes

Multiple independent reviews, including SHU video evidence, the NYC medical examiner, and the DOJ OIG, support suicide. The murder claim is a verifiable lie.

#Epstein#death#suicide#conspiracy#DOJ OIG#video

CHECK_11

Trump

U.S. President (2025–)

Partially accurate The evidence is incomplete, contested, or requires further authentication.

Claim

Trump denied writing a birthday message to Epstein that appeared in a released birthday book.

Source: BBC reporting on House Oversight release · 2025-09

Evidence

House Oversight Committee September 2025 release
The release included a birthday book containing a note to Epstein bearing Trump’s name.
BBC “What we know about the Epstein files”
Trump denied writing the note. The document itself is a primary source; handwriting/authentication analysis is not included in the public release.

Notes

The birthday book entry exists, but its provenance and handwriting are not publicly authenticated. Trump’s denial is plausible absent forensic verification. This entry is included to show an unresolved contradiction rather than a proven lie.

#birthday book#House Oversight#unverified

People index (1)

Trump — associate, uncharged

CHECK_12

Bill Clinton / Clinton spokesperson

Former U.S. President

Confirmed The verdict is reasonable but depends on a single authoritative source or interpretation.

Claim

Clinton has not spoken to Epstein in nearly 20 years.

Source: CNN, citing Clinton spokesperson · 2024-01-03

Evidence

Unsealed Giuffre v. Maxwell documents
Documents from the 2015–2016 period do not show recent communications between Clinton and Epstein. Flight logs and Sjoberg deposition concern earlier years.
Time analysis of names
The documents do not introduce new evidence of Clinton contact after the early 2000s.

Notes

The released documents do not contradict this claim. The strongest evidence of Clinton–Epstein contact is from the 2002 Africa trip and occasional flights. No post-2004 substantive contact is documented in the files.

#Clinton#contact#flight logs#time gap

People index (1)

Bill Clinton — associate, uncharged

CHECK_13

Alan Dershowitz

Harvard law professor, attorney

Partially accurate The verdict is reasonable but depends on a single authoritative source or interpretation.

Claim

Dershowitz stated he never met Virginia Giuffre and that her allegations against him were "totally false and made up."

Source: Public statements, court filings, media interviews · 2015–2022

Evidence

Giuffre deposition naming Dershowitz
Giuffre alleged in her sworn deposition that she was directed to have sexual contact with Dershowitz. The deposition is part of the unsealed court record.
Mutual dismissal of defamation suits (2022)
Dershowitz and Giuffre filed defamation claims against each other. Both were dismissed by stipulation in 2022 with no admission by either party. Giuffre later acknowledged she may have been mistaken about Dershowitz.

Notes

Giuffre named Dershowitz in her deposition but later acknowledged she may have been mistaken. The defamation suits were mutually dismissed without admission. Dershowitz's denial is partially supported by Giuffre's own retraction, but the initial sworn allegation exists in the record. Neither party was vindicated by a court ruling.

#Dershowitz#Giuffre#defamation#deposition#denial

People index (1)

Alan Dershowitz — named, settled

CHECK_14

Conspiracy theorists and commentators

Various

False claim Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad or CIA intelligence asset who used his network for espionage and blackmail.

Source: Widespread speculation across social media and commentary · 2019–present

Evidence

DOJ/FBI memo, July 2025
The DOJ/FBI review found "no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions" and no basis to predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.
DOJ Epstein Library, full release
No document in the 3.5 million page release identifies Epstein as an intelligence asset or documents a relationship with any intelligence agency.

Notes

No released document supports the claim that Epstein was an intelligence asset. The absence of evidence in 3.5 million pages is significant. However, absence of evidence is not proof of absence, the claim remains unverified rather than definitively disproven, but it is presented as fact without any supporting evidence.

#intelligence#Mossad#CIA#blackmail#conspiracy#unverified

CHECK_15

Commentators and reporters

Various

Unverified The verdict is reasonable but depends on a single authoritative source or interpretation.

Claim

Alexander Acosta was told Epstein "belonged to intelligence" and that was why the 2008 NPA was so lenient.

Source: Vanity Fair reporting, widely circulated · 2019

Evidence

Acosta public statements
Acosta's office and Acosta himself have not confirmed making such a statement. The claim traces to a single Vanity Fair anecdote about an off-the-record conversation.
DOJ Data Set 9, internal emails about NPA
Released internal DOJ emails about the NPA do not contain any reference to intelligence agency involvement or instructions to go easy on Epstein for intelligence reasons.

Notes

The claim traces to a single secondhand report. No primary document or on-record statement confirms it. The released DOJ emails about the NPA contain no reference to intelligence. The claim remains unverified.

#Acosta#intelligence#NPA#Vanity Fair#unverified

CHECK_16

Conspiracy theorists and social media

Various

False claim Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

The FBI destroyed evidence from the Epstein investigation to protect powerful people.

Source: Widespread social media claims · 2025–present

Evidence

DOJ/FBI memo, July 2025
The memo describes the systematic review of all evidence. It does not acknowledge destruction of evidence. It states the review "revealed no incriminating client list" and found no credible blackmail evidence.
DOJ 3.5 million page release (Jan. 2026)
The DOJ published approximately 3.5 million responsive pages, including 180,000 images and 2,000 videos. This large-scale release is inconsistent with a claim of systematic evidence destruction.

Notes

The publication of 3.5 million pages, including extensive audiovisual evidence, directly contradicts the claim that evidence was destroyed to protect anyone. No credible source has documented systematic evidence destruction.

#FBI#evidence#destruction#conspiracy#false claim

CHECK_17

Social media commentators

Various

False claim Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

Ghislaine Maxwell is cooperating with prosecutors and will name powerful people.

Source: Widespread social media speculation · 2022–present

Evidence

Maxwell sentencing and post-conviction record
Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years and has not been reported as cooperating. Her appeals have been denied. No DOJ filing indicates cooperation.
DOJ/FBI memo, July 2025
The memo states the FBI found "no basis to predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties," which is inconsistent with Maxwell having provided incriminating cooperation against named individuals.

Notes

No public record indicates Maxwell is cooperating. The DOJ/FBI finding that there is no basis to investigate uncharged third parties is inconsistent with the claim that Maxwell has named co-conspirators.

#Maxwell#cooperation#flip#conspiracy#false claim

CHECK_18

Commentators and social media

Various

Lie Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

The government is withholding the Epstein videos and refusing to release them.

Source: Widespread social media claims · 2025–2026

Evidence

DOJ release of Data Set 10
Data Set 10 contains 180,000 images and 2,000 videos seized from Epstein properties. These were released as part of the 3.5 million page production, though heavily redacted to protect victim identities.
DOJ 3.5 million page release announcement (Jan. 2026)
The DOJ announcement explicitly states that 2,000 videos and 180,000 images were included in the release.

Notes

Videos and images were released as part of Data Set 10. The claim that they are being withheld is directly contradicted by the DOJ's own announcement. Redactions to protect victim identities are legally required, not evidence of withholding.

#videos#images#Data Set 10#withholding#redaction

CHECK_19

Social media commentators

Various

Misleading Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

The flight logs prove that everyone listed participated in or knew about Epstein's crimes.

Source: Widespread social media interpretation · 2024–present

Evidence

DOJ flight logs
The flight logs are pilot records listing passengers on Epstein's aircraft. They document who was on the plane, not what happened at destinations. Many flights were legitimate travel (humanitarian trips, business travel, social visits).
DOJ/FBI memo, July 2025
The FBI found "no basis to predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties." Being on a flight log does not establish knowledge of or participation in crimes.

Notes

Flight logs document transportation, not criminal conduct. The 2002 Africa trip included Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey, and Chris Tucker for Clinton Foundation humanitarian work. Presence on a flight is not evidence of a crime.

#flight logs#passengers#misleading#overinterpretation

CHECK_20

Social media commentators

Various

Misleading Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

Being named in Epstein's contact book proves the person was involved in criminal activity.

Source: Widespread social media interpretation · 2024–present

Evidence

DOJ Epstein Library, contact books
The contact books are address books maintained by Epstein and his assistants. They contain thousands of names. Inclusion typically means Epstein had a phone number or social connection. Epstein collected contact information promiscuously.
DOJ/FBI memo, July 2025
The FBI found no basis to predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. Contact book inclusion alone does not establish criminal knowledge or participation.

Notes

Contact books contain thousands of names spanning Epstein's entire social and professional life. Most names reflect social or business connections, not criminal involvement. The DOJ/FBI explicitly found no basis to investigate uncharged third parties based on contact book inclusion.

#contact book#names#misleading#overinterpretation

CHECK_21

Various commentators

Various

Unverified The verdict is reasonable but depends on a single authoritative source or interpretation.

Claim

Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after learning about Epstein's behavior toward a young woman.

Source: Widely circulated claim, attributed to a 2017 book by a former Mar-a-Lago member · 2019–present

Evidence

BBC and FactCheck.org analysis
The claim traces to a single source, a 2017 book by a former Mar-a-Lago member. No primary document or on-record statement from Mar-a-Lago or Trump confirms a formal ban. The timing and circumstances are disputed.
Released documents
No released document references a Mar-a-Lago ban. Trump continued to appear in Epstein's contact books and social records after the alleged ban date.

Notes

The claim traces to a single secondhand source. No primary document confirms a formal ban. The continued social connection documented in contact books is inconsistent with a complete ban, though the relationship may have cooled.

#Mar-a-Lago#ban#unverified#single source

CHECK_22

Various commentators

Various

Unverified The verdict is reasonable but depends on a single authoritative source or interpretation.

Claim

Bill Clinton visited Epstein's private island (Little St. James) multiple times.

Source: Widespread claims, varying in specific count · 2024–present

Evidence

DOJ flight logs
Flight logs show Clinton traveled on Epstein's aircraft but do not document specific island visits. The logs record flights, not destinations in all cases.
FactCheck.org analysis
FactCheck.org found no evidence for specific island visit counts. Clinton's spokesperson has denied he visited the island.

Notes

Flight logs document Clinton's travel on Epstein's plane but do not conclusively document island visits. Clinton's spokesperson has denied island visits. The specific counts cited in public discourse (e.g., "28 times") are unsupported.

#Clinton#island#Little St. James#flight logs#unverified

CHECK_23

Various commentators

Various

Partially accurate The verdict is reasonable but depends on a single authoritative source or interpretation.

Claim

Epstein's Manhattan townhouse was a gift from Les Wexner in exchange for unspecified services.

Source: Widespread speculation · 2019–present

Evidence

Property records and financial documents
The Manhattan townhouse at 9 East 71st Street was originally owned by Wexner. Epstein acquired it through a transfer documented in property records. The exact terms of the transfer are part of the financial records.
Wexner public statements
Wexner has stated he severed ties with Epstein in 2007 after discovering approximately $46 million was missing from his finances.

Notes

The townhouse did originate from Wexner, but characterizing it as a "gift in exchange for services" is speculative. The transfer is documented in property records, but the terms and motivation are not fully public. Wexner has characterized himself as a victim of financial misconduct by Epstein.

#Wexner#townhouse#property#Manhattan#financial

CHECK_24

Social media commentators

Various

Lie Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

The DOJ admitted there were no victims or no crimes in the Epstein case.

Source: Misrepresentation of the July 2025 DOJ/FBI memo · 2025

Evidence

DOJ/FBI memo, July 2025
The memo stated the review confirmed Epstein harmed "over one thousand victims." It found no incriminating "client list" and no credible blackmail evidence, but it did not deny the existence of victims or crimes.
Maxwell conviction (2021)
Maxwell was convicted and sentenced to 20 years for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse minors. The crimes are established by conviction.

Notes

The DOJ memo confirmed "over one thousand victims." The claim that the DOJ denied victims or crimes is a direct misrepresentation of the memo's content. The memo found no client list and no blackmail, it did not find no crimes.

#DOJ#victims#misrepresentation#memo#lie

CHECK_25

Commentators across political spectrum

Various

False claim Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

AG Pam Bondi is deliberately withholding the full Epstein files and only releasing a small fraction.

Source: Commentary after the February 2025 "first phase" release of ~341 pages · 2025

Evidence

Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405, signed Nov. 2025)
The Act mandated the publication of all responsive documents. The February 2025 release was described as a "first phase" pending the legislation.
DOJ 3.5 million page release (Jan. 30, 2026)
The DOJ published approximately 3.5 million responsive pages, including 2,000 videos and 180,000 images, in compliance with the Act. This is not a "small fraction."

Notes

The February 2025 release was explicitly a "first phase." The full release of 3.5 million pages followed in January 2026 after the Transparency Act was signed. The claim of deliberate withholding is contradicted by the subsequent massive release.

#Bondi#withholding#Transparency Act#3.5 million pages#false claim

CHECK_26

Conspiracy theorists

Various

False claim Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

Epstein maintained a secret server farm on his private island used for blackmail storage.

Source: Widespread internet speculation · 2019–present

Evidence

DOJ/FBI memo, July 2025
The memo describes the review of all evidence. It found no credible blackmail evidence. No mention of a server farm or data storage facility on the island is made.
DOJ Epstein Library, property seizure records (Data Set 11)
Property seizure records document what was seized from Epstein's properties. No server farm or blackmail data infrastructure is documented.

Notes

No released document supports the existence of a server farm or blackmail storage on the island. The DOJ/FBI explicitly found no credible blackmail evidence. The claim is unsupported by any primary source.

#island#server#blackmail#conspiracy#false claim

CHECK_27

Various commentators

Various

Lie Multiple independent primary sources or official findings support the verdict.

Claim

Virginia Giuffre recanted all of her allegations, proving they were false.

Source: Misrepresentation of the Dershowitz settlement · 2022–present

Evidence

Dershowitz-Giuffre mutual dismissal (2022)
Giuffre acknowledged she may have been mistaken about Dershowitz specifically. She did not recant her allegations against Epstein, Maxwell, or Prince Andrew. The Dershowitz acknowledgment was limited to one individual.
Giuffre v. Prince Andrew settlement (2022)
Giuffre's civil case against Prince Andrew was settled in 2022 with no retraction of her allegations. Andrew acknowledged her status as an established victim in the settlement statement.

Notes

Giuffre acknowledged possible mistaken identity regarding Dershowitz alone. She did not recant her core allegations against Epstein, Maxwell, or Prince Andrew. The claim of total recantation is a misrepresentation.

#Giuffre#recantation#Dershowitz#misrepresentation#lie

Use this data carefully

The released files are redacted to protect victims. OCR errors and misinformation are common. Always verify against primary .gov sources before citing any claim as fact.

DOJ Epstein Library → FBI Vault → Research compendium → Raw lies library →